<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Political-Politics &#187; Global-Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.political-politics.com/tag/global-warming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.political-politics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming Effects in 2010 Debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.political-politics.com/political-news/global-warming-effects</link>
		<comments>http://www.political-politics.com/political-news/global-warming-effects#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Syndicated News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atlanta temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global-Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record highs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.political-politics.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My point is that it has been freezing cold this winter. Please forgive me northerners, but we usually have a smattering of 60+ degree days throughout the winter, but this year, we may have had one day that falls into that category. As a result, I am officially declaring an end to the Global Warming effects hysteria. That's right....Political Prostitution is taking the plunge and declaring all of the libs who believe in this debunked science as living in a serious state of denial.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.political-politics.com/political-news/global-warming-effects"></a></div>
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Global Warming Effects in 2010 Debunked" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/political-news/global-warming-effects" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="float: left; width: 270px; height: 270px;"><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
                     google_ad_client = "pub-6315558221102846"; /* 250x250, created 12/1/09 */ google_ad_slot = "8322699118"; google_ad_width = 250; google_ad_height = 250;
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<h2>Global Warming Activists in Absurd State of Denial</h2>
<p>I live in Atlanta, and I can tell you firsthand that we have had a winter like I haven&#8217;t seen in quite some time. As of today, we have had 4 winter storms this year, and we won&#8217;t be officially in the clear until a few weeks from now. At that point, we can finally declare the winter of 2010 as complete.</p>
<p>So what is my point?</p>
<p>My point is that it has been freezing cold this winter. Please forgive me northerners, but we usually have a smattering of 60+ degree days throughout the winter, but this year, we may have had one day that falls into that category. As a result, I am officially declaring an end to the Global Warming effects hysteria. That&#8217;s right&#8230;.Political Prostitution is taking the plunge and declaring all of the libs who believe in this debunked science as living in a serious state of denial.</p>
<h2>Wait a minute&#8230;&#8230;Why would I Declare Global Warming Effects as a Farce?</h2>
<p>It is really simple. The fact is that upon reviewing the data myself, I can declare that from a personal Atlanta point of view, the Global Warming argument doesn&#8217;t hold water. Here is why.</p>
<div id="attachment_342" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://www.political-politics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/41327968_snow4_ap.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-342 " title="_41327968_snow4_ap" src="http://www.political-politics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/41327968_snow4_ap.jpg" alt="Example of Global Warming Effects in Washington D.C." width="333" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Example of Global Warming Effects in Washington D.C.</p></div>
<p>Review the data below that goes over the record highs and lows for Atlanta, GA.  Out of 90 days over the 3 month period, there have only been 5 record highs since 2000. That&#8217;s right, only 5% of the record highs were set this decade, which has been inundated by the incessant Global Warming doom and gloom. Proportionately speaking, 5% is a much lower than the average number of record high temperatures in any given decade since the records started in the late 1800&#8242;s.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/daily/30080?climoMonth=1" target="_blank">Historical Atlanta temperature data for January</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/daily/30080?climoMonth=2" target="_blank">Historical Atlanta temperature data for February</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/daily/30080?climoMonth=3" target="_blank">Historical Atlanta temperature data for March</a></p>
<h3>Eat your Heart out Environmental Wackos.</h3>
<p>And it doesn&#8217;t stop there. Washington D.C. and much of the northeast had their biggest snowfalls in recorded history. But the nutjobs won&#8217;t declare defeat, instead claiming somehow that, &#8220;The recent massive snow events are a direct  Global Warming Effect?&#8221;</p>
<p>What? Good grief&#8230;&#8230;..Please get over yourself, and admit that you are losing! The Global Warming team is down by 35 points in the 4th quarter&#8230;&#8230;it will take a miracle for them to get back in the game.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-339"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Global Warming Effects in 2010 Debunked" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/political-news/global-warming-effects" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.political-politics.com/political-news/global-warming-effects/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everybody stop Breathing&#8230;Carbon Dioxide is Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/epa-carbon-dioxide-stud</link>
		<comments>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/epa-carbon-dioxide-stud#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global-Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Beings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.political-politics.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The environmental protection agency has come out with a finding geared towards pouring gasoline onto the global warming hoax. These lunatics are now suggesting that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not only heating the planet, but now this major building block of life is harmful to our health.<br />
<br />
I always thought that plants make oxygen out of carbon dioxide, which coincidentally enables humans to absorb the oxygen into our lungs giving us life. Just to be clear, I went out and found out the exact way that this process works.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/epa-carbon-dioxide-stud"></a></div>
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Everybody stop Breathing...Carbon Dioxide is Bad" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/epa-carbon-dioxide-stud" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="float: left; width: 270px; height: 270px;"><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
  google_ad_client = "pub-6315558221102846"; /* 250x250, created 12/1/09 */ google_ad_slot = "8322699118"; google_ad_width = 250; google_ad_height = 250;
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>What a load of BS.</p>
<p>The environmental protection agency has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/science/earth/08epa.html  " target="_blank">come out with a finding</a> geared towards pouring gasoline onto the global warming hoax. These lunatics are now suggesting that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not only heating the planet, but now this major building block of life is harmful to our health.</p>
<p>I always thought that plants make oxygen out of carbon dioxide, which coincidentally enables humans to absorb the oxygen into our lungs giving us life. Just to be clear, I went out and found out the exact way that this process works.</p>
<p>.</p>
<h2>How Humans turn Oxygen into Carbon Dioxide</h2>
<h2>&#8230;..by breathing</h2>
<p>The primary function of the respiratory system is to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide. Inhaled oxygen enters the lungs and reaches the alveoli. The layers of cells lining the alveoli and the surrounding capillaries are each only one cell thick and are in very close contact with each other. This barrier between air and blood averages about 1 micron (1/10,000 of a centimeter) in thickness. Oxygen passes quickly through this air-blood barrier into the blood in the capillaries. Similarly, carbon dioxide passes from the blood into the alveoli and is then exhaled.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-213" title="Carbon Monster" src="http://www.political-politics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Carbon-Monster.jpg" alt="Carbon Monster" width="267" height="202" /></p>
<p>Oxygenated blood travels from the lungs through the pulmonary veins and into the left side of the heart, which pumps the blood to the rest of the body. Oxygen-deficient, carbon dioxide-rich blood returns to the right side of the heart through two large veins, the superior vena cava and the inferior vena cava. Then the blood is pumped through the pulmonary artery to the lungs, where it picks up oxygen and releases carbon dioxide.</p>
<h2>For God&#8217;s Sake. Everybody stop Breathing&#8230;.Or else We will all Die</h2>
<p>So let me see if I am getting this right. When human beings breath, they give off CO2. If there are billions of people on the planet earth, then I see no other way to save the planet&#8230;..We have to stop breathing. Now.</p>
<p>If we do not stop warming the planet by exhaling carbon dioxide, we will surely be setting the stage for the destruction of planet Earth. If humans would only stop breathing, the rain forests would be saved, endangered species would flourish, and the horrific warming of the planet would stop. The only downfall to this utopia is the fact that we would all be dead.</p>
<p>But what about the Children?</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-202"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Everybody stop Breathing...Carbon Dioxide is Bad" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/epa-carbon-dioxide-stud" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/epa-carbon-dioxide-stud/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When did global warming turn into a forced religion?</title>
		<link>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climate-activists-target-children</link>
		<comments>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climate-activists-target-children#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global-Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.political-politics.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow......I happened across the following story in the New York Post. It seems like global warming topics are gaining momentum since climategate (covered in previous posts @Political Prostitution) made public various documents that "prove" that the fanatics are doctoring climate information to lend credence to the warming argument.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climate-activists-target-children"></a></div>
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="When did global warming turn into a forced religion?" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climate-activists-target-children" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="float: left; width: 270px; height: 270px;">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6315558221102846";
/* 250x250, created 12/1/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8322699118";
google_ad_width = 250;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
<p>Wow&#8230;&#8230;I happened across the following story in the New York Post. It seems like global warming topics are gaining momentum since climategate (covered in previous posts @Political Prostitution) made public various documents that &#8220;prove&#8221; that the fanatics are doctoring climate information to lend credence to the warming argument.</p>
<p>Hold onto your sanity while you read this&#8230;..</p>
<h2>Global Warming Activists Target Children to Spread Propaganda</h2>
<p>My daughter came home from school recently with a spring in her step and a song on her lips. With no foreshadowing &#8212; or time to call an exorcist &#8212; out came this chilling refrain:</p>
<p>&#8221; . . . You can hear the warning &#8212; GLOBAL WARMING . . . &#8221;</p>
<p>By the time her father and I removed our jaws from the floor, we had learned that:</p>
<p>A) All the kids had been coerced into singing this catchy ditty, which we called &#8220;The Warming Song,&#8221; at a concert for parents.<br />
<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-173" title="globalwarming freeze" src="http://www.political-politics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/globalwarming-freeze-300x240.jpg" alt="globalwarming freeze" width="300" height="240" /></p>
<p>B) Further song lyrics scolded selfish adults (that would be us) for polluting our planet and causing a warming scourge that would, in no short order, kill all the polar bears and threaten the birds and bees.</p>
<p>C) There was no deprogramming session on the menu. And no arguing allowed.</p>
<p>The international &#8220;Climategate&#8221; scandal is now moving into its third week. And reaction from folks on the scientific and political left &#8212; or is that redundant? &#8212; who treat global warming as a cult in which naysayers must be crushed has been depressing:</p>
<p>Total denial.</p>
<p>So, as the e-mails prove, the scientists did something about it. They cooked the books to exaggerate global warming.</p>
<p>Of course! How can you scare the bejeezus out of little kids and small animals if you can&#8217;t make the mercury move a millimeter? Simple. You lie.</p>
<p>Our children are on the front lines of the warming hysteria, a place where &#8220;experts&#8221; from Al Gore to the president leave no room for dissent or even the slightest skepticism, despite claims that are no more provable than the Earth is flat.</p>
<p>Children were the targets of a book co-written by the producer of Al Gore&#8217;s star-making vehicle, &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221; &#8212; a fantastical view of global warming that should have been called a fiction, not a documentary.</p>
<p>It may come to pass that global warming is real. Or not.</p>
<p>But your children won&#8217;t get the truth from Al Gore, the president or the scientific community. Or sadly, from school.</p>
<p>Neither will you.</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://current.com/http:/www.nypost.com/p/news/national/net_result_sure_beats_nut_revolt_qafIP4m2M9TAty2eLxyz5M/1#ixzz0YMX016KJ" target="_blank">http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/net_result_sure_beats_nut_revolt_qafIP4m2M&#8230;</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-172"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="When did global warming turn into a forced religion?" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climate-activists-target-children" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climate-activists-target-children/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Climategate make People Rethink Global Warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-document-scandal</link>
		<comments>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-document-scandal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global-Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temperature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.political-politics.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Climategate goes into its second week, the vigorous debate over the validity of global temperature data continues to be at the forefront of the scandal. In addition, some prominent climate scientists are demanding reform on how global warming research is conducted after thousands of private e-mail messages and documents were stolen from a climate research facility.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-document-scandal"></a></div>
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Will Climategate make People Rethink Global Warming?" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-document-scandal" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="float: left; width: 270px; height: 270px;">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6315558221102846";
/* 250x250, created 12/1/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8322699118";
google_ad_width = 250;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
<h2>Climategate Debate Continues. Climate Data Transparency Needed.</h2>
<p>As Climategate goes into its second week, the vigorous debate over the validity of global temperature data continues to be at the forefront of the scandal. In addition, some prominent climate scientists are demanding reform on how <span style="text-decoration: underline;">global warming </span> research is conducted after <span style="text-decoration: underline;">thousands of private e-mail messages and documents were stolen from a climate research facility.</span></p>
<p>Many scientists believe that the e-mail messages, which disclose the inner workings of a small network of climatologists who chart the planet’s temperature, have damaged the public’s trust in the evidence that the planet is dangerously warming, just global warming talks are set to begin in Denmark.<br />
<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-163" title="image_316_171" src="http://www.political-politics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_316_171-300x300.jpg" alt="image_316_171" width="210" height="210" /></p>
<p>“This whole concept of, ‘We’re the experts, trust us,’ has clearly gone by the wayside with these e-mails,” said Judith Curry, a climate scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology.</p>
<p>She and other scientists argue that scientists should re-evaluate the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the panel that in 2007 concluded that humans were the dominant force driving global warming and whose findings serve as the basis for international discussions determining a new climate treaty.</p>
<p>The e-mail correspondence includes heated conversations about warming trends, advice on deleting controversial e-mail messages and how to distribute negative comments about climate skeptics. These emails serve as evidence of a conspiracy to suppress opposing views and withhold data from public in a scandal that has come to be known as “Climategate.”</p>
<p>However, questions have been raised about whether the evidence indicates that climatologists  tried to prevent distribution of articles written by climate skeptics, described  in the e-mail messages as “garbage” and “fraud.”</p>
<p>Many regulators believe that the affair could affect negotiations over a new global climate treaty. “This is very serious and can put the whole climate debate, including any future agreement in Copenhagen and beyond, in big question,” a leading politician said in an e-mail message. And even some environmental campaigners believe that the disclosures have damaged calls for climate action.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-162"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Will Climategate make People Rethink Global Warming?" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-document-scandal" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-document-scandal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate &#124; Global Warming Result of Sun not Carbon Dioxide</title>
		<link>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-hacker-scandal</link>
		<comments>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-hacker-scandal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global-Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.political-politics.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unidentified persons hacked a server used by the Climatic Research Unit, posting online copies of e-mails and documents that they found.  The incident is being investigated by police and involved the alleged theft of more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 other documents, consisting of 160 MB of data in total.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-hacker-scandal"></a></div>
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Climategate | Global Warming Result of Sun not Carbon Dioxide" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-hacker-scandal" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="float: left; width: 270px; height: 270px;">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6315558221102846";
/* 250x250, created 12/1/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8322699118";
google_ad_width = 250;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
<p>I love the fact that there is an accelerating movement towards Global Warming skepticism. The floodgates may have opened recently with a hacker&#8217;s breach for the Climatic Research Center.</p>
<p>Here is how it went down.</p>
<p>Unidentified persons hacked a server used by the Climatic Research  Unit, posting online copies of e-mails and documents that they found.<span style="font-size: small;"><span> </span></span> The  incident is being investigated by police and  involved the alleged theft of more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 other  documents, consisting of 160 MB of data in  total.</p>
<p>The alleged breach was first discovered after someone allegedly hacked the  server of the RealClimate website on 17 November and uploaded a copy of the stolen files. According to Gavin  Schmidt of RealClimate, &#8220;At around 6.20am (EST) Nov  17th, somebody hacked into the RC server from an IP address associated with a computer somewhere in  Turkey, disabled access from the legitimate users, and uploaded a file  <em>FOIA.zip</em> to our server.&#8221; A link to the file on the RealClimate server was posted from a Russian IP  address to the Climate Audit blog at 7.24 am (EST) with the  comment &#8220;A miracle just happened&#8221;. The alleged hack was discovered by RealClimate and the University of East Anglia  was notified.<br />
<div id="attachment_153" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-153" title="al-gore-plane" src="http://www.political-politics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/al-gore-plane1-300x212.gif" alt="al-gore-plane" width="300" height="212" /><p class="wp-caption-text">How much fuel does Gore burn in his Private Jet?</p></div><br />
On 19 November the files were uploaded to a Russian server before being  copied to numerous locations across the Internet. An  anonymous statement accompanying the e-mails defended the alleged hacking, on  the ground that climate science is &#8220;too important to be kept under wraps&#8221; and  describing the material as &#8220;a random selection of correspondence, code, and  documents.&#8221;  The  stolen material was first publicised on 19 November on <em>The Air Vent</em>, a  climate-sceptic blog.</p>
<p>The following chart gives a prime example of data that has been suppressed by the research group!</p>
<p><img title="Greenhouse Gas Holes Solar Irradiation Chart" src="http://www.greenhousegasholes.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GHGH-Solar-Irradiation-Chart.jpg" alt="So is Solar Irradiation or CO2 Responsible for Climate Change?" width="558" height="415" /></p>
<p>So is Solar Irradiation or CO2 Responsible for Climate  Change?</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-148"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
	<div style="">
		<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-text="Climategate | Global Warming Result of Sun not Carbon Dioxide" data-url="http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-hacker-scandal" target="_blank">Tweet</a>
	</div>
	<script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.political-politics.com/global-warming/climategate-hacker-scandal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

